Ex Parte MILLER et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2586                                                        
          Application No. 08/856,501                                                  

               The claimed invention is directed to a method for making an            
          abrasive tool.  A stencil is placed against a tool body and a               
          brazing paste is placed in the cavities of the stencil.  After              
          the stencil is removed to form parcels of brazing paste on the              
          tool body, abrasive grains are deposited in the parcels.  Then              
          the tool is thermally processed to braze the abrasive grains to             
          the cutting surface.                                                        

               The claimed subject matter may be further understood with              
          reference to the appealed claims appended to appellants' brief.             

               The references of record relied upon by the examiner as                
          evidence of obviousness are:                                                
          Steindler               4,510,990            May   12, 1970                 
          Tselesin                5,380,390            Jan.  10, 1995                 
                                    THE REJECTION                                     

               Claims 1 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as            
          unpatentable over Tselesin in view of Steindler.  The examiner              
          states that to apply the technique of Tselesin to a curved                  
          surface of a preform to form a patterned abrasive member would              
          have been obvious in view of Steindler.                                     

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007