Appeal No. 2001-2616
Application No. 09/101,704
and the respective viewpoints of appellant and the examiner.
As a consequence of our review, we make the determinations
which follow.
We do not sustain the rejection of appellant’s claims
before us.
Independent claim 14 is drawn to a process for
continuously winding a plurality of longitudinally cut paper
webs at machine speed by using support rollers and at least
one pair of disks associated with each of the support rollers
and, inter alia, requires the steps of axially adjusting the
disks of the at least one pair of disks to correspond to a
width of web to be wound and running the supporting rollers
and a first cardboard tube up to machine speed thereby winding
the web onto the first cardboard drive, wherein the first
cardboard tube is driven by a first core winding device.
Independent claim 17 recites a device for continuously winding
3(...continued)
been expected to draw from the disclosure. See In re Preda,
401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007