Ex Parte KAMETANI et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2635                                                        
          Application 09/168,083                                                      

          Appellants’ invention relates to a golf ball having a cover                 
          and a transfer printed pattern in reverse on said cover, wherein            
          the transfer printed pattern includes an ink layer containing a             
          pigment and a dispersion of small, flattened metal particles. On            
          page 2 of the specification, appellants note that an object of              
          the invention is to provide a golf ball having a transferred                
          pattern with a metallic luster and which is superior in                     
          durability. A copy of representative claim 9, as found in the               
          Appendix to appellants’ brief, is attached to this decision.1               

          The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Murphy                   5,427,378                Jun. 27, 1995             




               1                                                                      
               1 Regarding dependent claim 5, we note that the version of             
          this claim shown in the Appendix to the brief is incorrect. Claim           
          5 as originally presented depends from “claim 4,” and has never             
          been amended to alter that dependency. However, since claim 4 was           
          canceled in Paper No. 8, filed September 6, 2000, claim 5 now               
          depends from a canceled claim. This defect is worthy of                     
          correction during any further prosecution of this application               
          before the examiner. For purposes of appeal, we will assume that            
          claim 5 depends from independent claim 9, as do all of the other            
          claims remaining in the application.                                        
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007