The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TIMOTHY C. OSTWALD and DANIEL JAMES PLUTT
__________
Appeal No. 2001-2664
Application 09/354,814
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before ABRAMS, PATE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 28 and 30 through 33. These are the only claims
remaining in the application. We note that it appears from the
examiner’s answer, that the examiner has included claim 29 in the
rejection. However, claim 29 was canceled in paper no. 5, filed
November 27, 2000.
The claimed invention is directed to a system for moving a
plurality of cartidges between a plurality of storage libraries.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007