Appeal No. 2001-2669 Application 09/043,950 for mounting on a syringe” (specification, page 1). Representative claim 1 reads as follows: 1. A needle assembly comprising an injection needle and a needle hub mountable on a syringe, wherein said hub includes a center portion securing said injection needle in said hub, wherein said needle has an injection part projecting axially from said center portion and terminating in a skin piercing obliquely cut end, where the length of the injection part lies in the interval 4-6 mm. THE PRIOR ART The references relied on by the examiner to support the final rejection are: Crossman 5,015,235 May 14, 1991 Rufenacht & Latchaw, “Table 5. Conversion Chart for MM, Inch, French, and Gauge,” p. 256, (Rufenacht)1 THE REJECTIONS Claims 1 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Crossman. Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Crossman in view of Rufenacht. Attention is directed to the appellants’ main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 13 and 16) and to the examiner’s final 1 Although the copy of the Rufenacht reference which is of record does not bear a publication date, the appellants do not dispute that it is prior art with respect to the claimed invention. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007