The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 35 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FREDERICK MORELLO _____________ Appeal No. 2001-2689 Application No. 09/215,021 ______________ HEARD: JANUARY 10, 2002 _______________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Frederick Morello appeals from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 12-21 and 28 as amended by an amendment1 filed subsequent to the final rejection in this reissue application of Patent No. 5,249,445.2 Claims 1-11, which are original patent claims, and claims 22-27, added by amendment, have been allowed. 1Two amendments subsequent to the final rejection have been filed. The first, filed on December 4, 2000 (Paper No. 19), has not been entered. The second, filed on January 4, 2001 (Paper No. 22) has been entered. 2The instant reissue application was filed on December 17, 1998, approximately 4 years and 10 months subsequent to the issue date of October 5, 1993 of the original patent.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007