The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte BRUCE E. MORRIS ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0027 Application No. 08/963,812 ____________ HEARD: AUGUST 14, 2002 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 7 through 21. Claims 1 through 6 have been allowed. Claims 22 and 23, the only other claims in the application, have been objected to as being dependent from a rejected base claim, but have also been indicated by the examiner to be allowable if rewritten in independent form. As noted on page 2 of the specification, appellant’s invention relates to a tapping connector or tapping flange for connecting branch pipes to carrier pipes, such as subsea carrierPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007