Ex Parte MORRIS - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 23         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                               Ex parte BRUCE E. MORRIS                               
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2002-0027                                 
                              Application No. 08/963,812                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                HEARD: AUGUST 14, 2002                                
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 7 through 21. Claims 1 through 6 have been              
          allowed. Claims 22 and 23, the only other claims in the                     
          application, have been objected to as being dependent from a                
          rejected base claim, but have also been indicated by the examiner           
          to be allowable if rewritten in independent form.                           


          As noted on page 2 of the specification, appellant’s                        
          invention relates to a tapping connector or tapping flange for              
          connecting branch pipes to carrier pipes, such as subsea carrier            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007