The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANTHONY ITALO PROVITOLA ____________ Appeal No. 2002-0030 Application No. 09/314,267 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 3, 5, 7 to 13, 15, 17, 18 and 20. Claims 4, 6, 14, 16 and 19 have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. The appellant appeals only claims 1, 2, 5, 7 to 12, 15, 17 and 20. The appellant does not appeal from the final rejection of claims 3, 13 and 18. We REVERSE and REMAND.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007