Appeal No. 2002-0032 Page 2 Application No. 08/514,507 BACKGROUND This is an application for reissue of U.S. Patent No. 5,899,247, which has been sought on the basis that the appellant claimed less than he had a right to claim in the original application. The appellant's invention as recited in claim 10 relates to a bagging machine having a non-flexible anchor for resisting the movement of the machine away from the material being bagged. The claim has been reproduced in an appendix to the Brief. The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claim is: Cullen 5,425,220 Jun. 20, 1995 Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Cullen. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the Answer (Paper No. 18) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to the Brief (Paper No. 17) for the appellant's arguments thereagainst. OPINION In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given careful consideration to the appellant's specification and claims, to the applied prior art reference, and to thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007