Ex Parte RUFFA - Page 3

          Appeal No. 2002-0175                                                        
          Application No. 09/090,225                                                  

          § 103 as being unpatentable over Hibbert in view Conklin or Lee,            
          Gilbert, and Wyman.                                                         
               For the reasons set forth in the brief, and below, we                  
          reverse each of the above-noted rejections.                                 

                                         OPINION                                      
               At issue is whether the combination of applied references              
          teach or suggest a panel of film material being sealed length-              
          wise thereof to define a plurality of small diameter pressurized            
          tubes such that adjacent tubes share a lengthwise seal.                     

          I.  Claim Interpretation                                                    
               The meaning of the phrase, “panel of film material being               
          sealed length-wise thereof to define a plurality of small                   
          diameter pressurized tubes such that adjacent tubes share a                 
          lengthwise seal”, is best defined with reference to Figure 4 of             
          appellant’s specification, reproduced below.                                











               In Figure 4, there is panel 28 of a film material wherein              
          the panel is sealed lengthwise to define a plurality of small               
          diameter pressurized tubes 32 such that adjacent tubes 32 share             
                                          3                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007