Appeal No. 2002-0178 Application 09/385,909 surfactants. Therefore, it would have been obvious to utilize the surfactants recited in Wong in the invention of Tsutsumi to arrive at appellants’ claimed invention. Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 29. XVI. The rejection of claim 33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Tsutsumi in view of Lin The examiner relies on Lin, which discloses ink jet inks, for teaching the use of a printer having 600 spi and nozzle size of 10 to 49 1m, in order to produce an ink image with high resolution, and refers to column 2 at lines 14-17 of Lin. The examiner states that it would have been obvious to use a printer with Lin’s specific spi and nozzle size when printing the ink of Tsutsumi in order to produce a high resolution image. We find that sufficient motivation exists in this regard. We therefore affirm the rejection of claim 33. XVII. Conclusion All the art rejections are affirmed except for the rejections of claim 16 (claim 16 was rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Collins in view of either Puschak or Villiger, and claim 16 was also rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Tsutsumi in view of Puschak or Villiger). 16Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007