Appeal No. 2002-0190 Application No. 09/149,018 McMordie is silent as to whether the article contains sulfur. However, McMordie discloses depositing the platinum layer by electroplating (col. 7, lines 12-15; col. 9, lines 62-63; col. 10, line 67; col. 14, lines 19-20), and the examiner finds, based upon the appellants’ specification, that a platinum layer formed by electroplating necessarily contains sulfur (answer, page 7).2 Because the examiner’s finding is reasonable and the appellants have not argued that it is incorrect, we accept it as fact. See In re Kunzmann, 326 F.2d 424, 425 n.3, 140 USPQ 235, 236 n.3 (CCPA 1964). The examiner argues that McMordie grit blasts the aluminum/silicon layer in order to remove undiffused coating residues, and that because this process step is the same as that of the appellants, it would remove sulfur-concentrated material as required by the appellants’ claim 1 (answer, pages 3-4). The examiner, however, has not established that McMordie’s undiffused aluminum/silicon slurry material, i.e., material which has not diffused into the platinum-coated substrate, contains sulfur. Hence, the examiner has not established the McMordie would have fairly suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, removing a 2 The specification states (page 4, lines 3-7): “The deposition of the platinum-containing first layer and the aluminum-containing second layer leave these layers with a relatively high sulfur content. In particular, the first layer is normally electrodeposited onto the surface of the substrate, which leaves a high sulfur content in the first layer.” 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007