Ex Parte HOEFLICH et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2002-0265                                                                Page 4                
              Application No. 08/787745                                                                                 


              control was obtained in the prior art by providing intentional discontinuities1 in the shaft,             
              which the appellants believe gives rise to certain disadvantages (specification, pages 1                  
              and 2).  The desired characteristics of transmitting a good “feel” the player’s hands                     
              while providing the shaft with a high degree of controlled flexure are accomplished in                    
              accordance with the invention by providing a shaft in which the diameter of the butt                      
              section is reduced with respect to prior art shafts and which tapers without intervening                  
              discontinuities to a tip portion, with the diameter of the butt end and the tip end being                 
              within particular ranges.                                                                                 
                     The invention is expressed in claim 1 in the following manner:                                     
                     1. A golf club shaft comprising:                                                                   
                            an elongated tubular shaft comprising a plurality of layers of fibers                       
                     imbedded in a synthetic resin, said elongated shaft having a but end of                            
                     relatively larger cross sectional diameter tapering without intervening                            
                     discontinuities to a tip end of relatively smaller diameter, said tip end                          
                     having an outside diameter between .330 and .400 inches;                                           
                            said butt end having an outside diameter of .400 to .540 inches.                            
              Our understanding of the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 is that all of the subject matter                
              recited therein is disclosed in Akatsuka ‘450 in view of the fact that the ranges disclosed               
              in the reference in column 5, lines 62-68, encompass the ranges for the butt end recited                  

                     1The appellants have defined “discontinuity” in terms of providing examples by way of reference to 
              three prior art patents (specification, paragraph bridging pages 1 and 2).  The examples of intentional   
              discontinuities discussed are (1) mismatching the elasticity of the materials making up the lower shaft and
              the butt portion, (2) imposing a discontinuous flexible zone (bubble) between a rigid butt section and the
              rest of the shaft, and (3) abruptly increasing the diameter of the shaft from a narrow butt to a wider section
              immediately below the butt section.                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007