The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LOUIS DISCHLER
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0271
Application No. 09/467,406
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 11, 25 and 28 through
30. While appellant's Notice of Appeal (Paper No. 10) also
included claims 21 through 24 as being subject to appeal, we
observe that appellant's brief (Paper No. 13) does not list those
claims as "appealed" and that such claims have not been included
in appellant's "GROUPING OF REJECTED CLAIMS" (Brief, page 3) or a
copy thereof supplied in the Appendix of claims on appeal
attached to the brief. Accordingly, we consider that appellant
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007