Appeal No. 2002-0283
Application 09/328,918
Claims 12, 17, 20 through 24 and 29 through 38 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing
subject matter which was not described in the specification in
such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant
art that the inventor, at the time the application was filed, had
possession of the claimed invention.
Claims 12, 17, 20 through 24 and 29 through 38 additionally
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as
containing subject matter which was not described in the
specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art
to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected,
to make and/or use the invention.
Claims 12, 17, 20 through 24 and 29 through 38 also stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being
indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly
claim that which appellant regards as the invention.
Claims 12 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Bendiksen.
Claims 12, 17, 20, 21, 23, 29 through 31 and 34 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by
Walkowe.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007