Ex Parte ADACHI - Page 4




            Appeal No. 2002-0293                                                          Page 4              
            Application No. 09/192,564                                                                        


                   To the extent that appellant is arguing that one of ordinary skill in the art of           
            polishing would not understand the surface finish value of “on the order of 0.005                 
            microns” as used by Malshe as referring to a surface roughness on the order of 0.005              
            microns (5 nm), we do not consider this argument to be well taken.  From our                      
            perspective, one of ordinary skill in the art, reading the above-mentioned sentence of            
            Malshe as a whole would have understood that, by “surface finish on the order of 0.005            
            microns,” Malshe meant a surface roughness on the order of 0.005 microns (5 nm).                  
                   We do, however, share appellant’s view that it is not apparent whether the                 
            surface finish/roughness value cited by Malshe refers to an arithmetic average (Ra)               
            surface roughness value or a root mean square (Rms) surface roughness value (Rq).                 
            As pointed out by the Metals Handbook (p. 27-22), the ratio of the root mean square               
            surface roughness value (Rq) to the arithmetic average surface roughness value (Ra)               
            can vary anywhere from 1.16 to at least as high as 2.10, depending on the type of                 
            polishing process used.  Thus, while it is certainly possible, and even in our view likely1,      
            that the ion beam polished diamond film referred to in the background section of the              
            Malshe patent does have a surface roughness (Rms) within the range of from 0.5 to                 
            10.0 nm as called for in claim 7, the disclosure of the Malshe patent is too speculative          
            to permit a conclusion that this is necessarily the case and the examiner has not                 
            provided any additional evidence to establish that one of ordinary skill in the art would         

                   1 Table 1 on page 27-22 of the Metals Handbook notes that a practical first approximation for the
            ratio Rq/Ra for most processes is 1.25.  Thus, even assuming that the surface finish/roughness value
            referred to by Malshe is an arithmetic average value, the root mean square (Rms) value would likely still
            fall within the range recited in claim 7.                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007