Appeal No. 2002-0396 Application No. 08/331,280 vary the pick count such that the desired flexibility increase from the proximal end to the distal end is obtained. The second supplemental declaration under 37 CFR § 1.131, therefore, shows possession of subject matter which at least would have rendered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art so much of the claimed invention as Pray shows. Hence, the declaration has removed Pray as a reference. Rejection of claim 9 The appellants’ claim 9 does not include any variation in picks per inch such as that recited in claim 1. The appellants do not argue that Pray is unavailable as a reference for the disclosures therein relied upon by the examiner regarding claim 9. The appellants’ claim 9 requires an inner cured resin layer having over it a braid layer extending from the proximal end of the microtube to an intermediate point, and requires that from the intermediate point to the distal end of the microtube, the braid layer is the inner layer.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007