Ex Parte KEITH et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2002-0396                                                          
          Application No. 08/331,280                                                    


          vary the pick count such that the desired flexibility increase                
          from the proximal end to the distal end is obtained.                          
               The second supplemental declaration under 37 CFR § 1.131,                
          therefore, shows possession of subject matter which at least                  
          would have rendered obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art               
          so much of the claimed invention as Pray shows.  Hence, the                   
          declaration has removed Pray as a reference.                                  
                                 Rejection of claim 9                                   
               The appellants’ claim 9 does not include any variation in                
          picks per inch such as that recited in claim 1.  The appellants               
          do not argue that Pray is unavailable as a reference for the                  
          disclosures therein relied upon by the examiner regarding                     
          claim 9.                                                                      
               The appellants’ claim 9 requires an inner cured resin layer              
          having over it a braid layer extending from the proximal end of               
          the microtube to an intermediate point, and requires that from                
          the intermediate point to the distal end of the microtube, the                
          braid layer is the inner layer.                                               














Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007