The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VIKTORS BERSTIS
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0604
Application No. 09/240,926
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 3, 6,
8-14, 17-23, 26-28 and 32-37. Claims 29-31 have been indicated as containing
patentable subject matter and allowable if recast in independent form, and claims 1, 2,
4, 5, 7, 15, 16, 24 and 25 have been canceled.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007