Ex Parte Moody et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-0949                                                          Page 2              
            Application No. 09/514,860                                                                        


                   The appellants’ invention relates to electronic video poker games.   Claim 1 is            
            illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:                                               
                         1.  A method of playing a card game comprising:                                      
                                a) dealing a first hand comprising an initial five cards                      
                         all face up;                                                                         
                                b) selecting none, one or more of the face up cards                           
                         from the first hand as cards to be held;                                             
                                c) discarding from the first hand the cards that were                         
                         not selected to be held and replacing each of those cards                            
                         with a face up card;                                                                 
                                d) determining the poker hand ranking of the resulting                        
                         cards of the first hand                                                              
                                e) redisplaying the initial five cards as a second hand;                      
                                f) selecting none, one or more of the face up cards of                        
                         the redisplayed cards as cards to be held;                                           
                                g) discarding from the second hand the cards that                             
                         were not selected to be held and replacing each of those                             
                         cards with a face up card;                                                           
                                h) determining the poker hand ranking of the resulting                        
                         cards of the second hand.                                                            




                   The examiner relied upon the following prior art references in rejecting the               
            appealed claims:                                                                                  
            Kadlic                                 5,816,915                 Oct.  6, 1998                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007