The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MICHAEL STEFFE __________ Appeal No. 2002-0978 Application 09/535,065 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before COHEN, PATE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 12 through 22. These are all of the claims in the application. Claims 1 through 11 were subject to a restriction requirement and have been canceled. The claimed invention is directed to a racheting open-end wrench.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007