Ex Parte ERDOES et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written          
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   
                                                                                      Paper No. 15            
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   

                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                Ex parte BRENDA ERDOES and JEFF ERDOES                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-1062                                             
                                           Application No. 09/285,607                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                          HEARD: September 17, 2002                                           
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
            ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4.            
            Claims 5 and 6 have been withdrawn by the examiner as being directed to a non-                    
            elected invention.                                                                                


                   We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                         










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007