Appeal No. 2002-1265 Page 7
Application No. 09/558,575
the examiner determines that any of claims 30 to 32 are not anticipated by Arnold, then
the examiner should explictly state how those claims define over Arnold.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 30 to 32 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed. In addition, we have remanded the application to the
examiner for further consideration.
REVERSED and REMANDED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007