Appeal No. 2002-1268
Application 09/282,672
THE REJECTIONS
Claims 1, 11, 12 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over either Huff ‘491 or Huff
‘801.
Claims 2 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the references applied against claim 1
and further in view of Issler.
Claims 3 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over the references applied against claims 2
and 12 and further in view of Rudy.
Claims 4, 5, 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over the references applied
against claims 1 and 12 and further in view of Bates.
Claims 6, 9 and 17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over the references applied against claims
1 and 15 and further in view of any one of Tilles, Marc, Gross or
Boys.
Claim 10 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007