Appeal No. 2002-1276 Application 09/405,971 recited in independent claims 1, 10 and 18 stems solely from hindsight knowledge impermissibly derived from the appellants’ disclosure. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 1, 10 and 18, and dependent claims 2 through 9, 11 through 17, 19 and 20, as being unpatentable over Cremonese in view of Alexander. SUMMARY The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 20 is reversed. REVERSED NEAL E. ABRAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ) ) APPEALS AND LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) )Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007