The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte NIGEL F. MISSO and STEVE S. ECKERD _____________ Appeal No. 2002-1336 Application No. 09/259,062 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Nigel F. Misso and Steve S. Eckerd appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 8-13, 15 and 17-25, all the claims pending in the application. Subsequently, the examiner withdrew the only rejection of claim 20. Accordingly, only claims 1-4, 6, 8-13, 15, 17-19 and 21-25 remain before us on appeal. An amendment filed subsequent to the final rejection on November 30, 2000 (Paper No. 12) has been entered.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007