Ex Parte REEDY - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-1645                                                                Page 2                
              Application No. 09/281,553                                                                                


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The appellant's invention relates to a walking aid adapted to support a patient                    
              during physical therapy (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set                  
              forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                                                           


                     The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                      
              Engelhart                          4,312,505                          Jan. 26, 1982                       
              Sorrell et al. (Sorrell)           5,271,422                          Dec. 21, 1993                       
              Fochs                              5,443,304                          Aug. 22, 1995                       
              Haruyama                           5,803,103                          Sept. 8, 1998                       
                                                                             (filed June 23, 1997)                      



                     Claims 1 to 10, 12 to 15, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                     
              being anticipated by Engelhart.                                                                           


                     Claims 12 to 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                    
              Sorrell.                                                                                                  


                     Claims 1, 2, 5 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                             
              anticipated by Haruyama.                                                                                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007