Appeal No. 2002-1645 Page 2 Application No. 09/281,553 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a walking aid adapted to support a patient during physical therapy (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Engelhart 4,312,505 Jan. 26, 1982 Sorrell et al. (Sorrell) 5,271,422 Dec. 21, 1993 Fochs 5,443,304 Aug. 22, 1995 Haruyama 5,803,103 Sept. 8, 1998 (filed June 23, 1997) Claims 1 to 10, 12 to 15, 18 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Engelhart. Claims 12 to 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sorrell. Claims 1, 2, 5 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Haruyama.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007