The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TAM KIEN LE ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1685 Application No. 08/995,431 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before McQUADE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on Appeal This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 14 to 17, 20 and 23. Claims 18, 19, 21, 22, 24 and 25 are allowed. Claims 1 to 13 have been canceled. The appellant’s invention relates to a spring door crustacean trap. A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant’s brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007