The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RUDOLF SALZEDER
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1766
Application No. 09/018,790
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 20 to
30, 32, 33, 34 and 36 to 42, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Claims 1 to 19, 31, and 35 have been cancelled.
The appellant's invention relates to a camouflage means including at least one
releasable active material in at least one container to interrupt the line of sight as well
as a camouflage procedure to use this camouflage means (specification, p. 1). A copy
of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.
The prior art
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007