Ex Parte MENYES et al - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 19              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                       Ex parte PETER SCHWAB, MARTIN SCHAFER                          
                                   AND ARTHUR HOHN                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2002-1933                                  
                               Application 09/331,417                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before GARRIS, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 15-28,               
          which are all of the claims remaining in the application.                   
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a                 
          process for producing a specified oligomer mixture by catalyzed             
          metathesis reaction of cyclopentene and acyclic monoolefins.                
          Claim 15 is illustrative:                                                   


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007