The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES H. KEMP, ROBERTO CRUZ,
NATAN VAISMAN and WALTER VONARBURG
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2156
Application No. 29/113,438
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, GARRIS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of the following
design claim:
The ornamental design for a toothbrush as shown and described.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007