Ex Parte Belissent et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          was not written for publication and is not binding precedent                
          of the Board.                                                               

                                                            Paper No. 18              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte JACQUES BELISSENT,                              
                             FRED BATTY, TIMOTHY MISNER,                              
                                   DARYL HUFF and                                     
                                   ANIL SRIVASTAVA                                    
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0334                                  
                               Application 09/519,964                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before JERRY SMITH, KRASS, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-19, which constitute              
          all the claims in the application.                                          

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007