Interference No. 104,101
Page 33
IV. Judgment
Upon consideration of the record, it is:
ORDERED that priority of invention as to Count 2, the sole count in interference, is
awarded against junior party Lilly.
FURTHER ORDERED that Lilly is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-7, 21-
22, 46, 50 and 54 of Lilly, U.S. Application No. 08/508,434.
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision shall be placed and given a paper
number in Lilly, U.S. Application No. 08/508,434 and Cameron, U.S. Application No.
08/628,605.
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to
35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
RICHARD E. SCHAFER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
SALLY GARDINER-LANE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007