Ex Parte JOHNSON - Page 15




            Interference No. 104,315                                                                                     
            Sauer Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg. Co., Ltd.                                                               

                   Conception is the complete performance of the mental part of the inventive act, and all               
            that remains to be accomplished belongs to the department of construction, not invention.                    
            Coleman v. Dines, 754 F.2d 353, 359, 224 USPQ 857, 862 (Fed. Cir. 1985). "It is settled that in              
            establishing conception a party must show possession of every feature recited in the count, and              
            that every limitation of the count must have been known to the inventor at the time of the alleged           
            conception." Id.; see also Sewall v. Walters, 30 USPQ2d 1356, 1358-59 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Even                 
            Sauer recognizes, on page 49 of its brief, that to prove conception, it must show possession of              
            each and every feature or limitation in the count, citing Cabilly v. Bos , 55 USPQ2d 1238, 1255              
            (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1998).                                                                                 
                   According to the count, the center section includes a generally L-shaped member having                
            a first leg and a second leg which are integrally joined at right angles to each other. Further              
            according to the count, the second leg has (1) a first surface extending at right angles away from           
            the first surface of the first leg on which is located a mounting surface, and (2) a second surface          
            opposite the first surface, with another mounting surface on the second surface of the second leg.           
                   Exhibit 2225 is an annotated version of two sheets of figures of Exhibit 2045, and                    
            contains annotations placed there by Sauer to explain how the figures shown satisfy the count in             
            this interference. Sauer identifies the first leg by the reference numeral 74, the second leg by the         
            reference numeral 75, the first surface of the first leg by the reference numeral 72; and the second         
            surface of the second leg by the reference numeral 73. By that scheme, the first surface of the              
            second leg is hidden from view and located on the bottom of the second leg 75. Clearly, the first            

                                                       - 15 -                                                            






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007