interest on the part of Elias Snitzer in Hill's work (Finding
69).
Anderson also objects to the admissibility of Hill exhibit
2045, paragraph 20, since Dr. Hill testifies that he made
gratings with a phase mask by the spring of 1992. Hill does not
rely on this statement to aver an earlier date of conception.
Accordingly, we have not considered the exhibits 2044 or 2045
with respect to demonstrating a prior conception of 24 April
1992.
Accordingly, Anderson's motion to suppress Hill Exhibit 2044
and portions of Hill exhibit 2045 and 2048 is dismissed as moot.
D. Judgment
Based on our decision, it is
ORDERED that judgment as to Count 2 (Paper 209), the sole
count in the interference, is awarded against junior party DANA
Z. ANDERSON, TURAN ERDOGAN, and VICTOR MIZRAHI;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party DANA Z. ANDERSON, TURAN
ERDOGAN, and VICTOR MIZRAHI is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 1, 2 and 5-8 (corresponding to Count 2) of U.S.
Patent 5,327,515;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to Count 2 (Paper 209), the
sole count in the interference, is awarded against senior party
ELIAS SNITZER, and JOHN D. PROHASYA:
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party ELIAS SNITZER, and JOHN D.
64
Page: Previous 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007