Ex Parte PAGE - Page 43




                       In particular, the following portion (“first portion”) of the Cabilly applications appears                     
               under the heading “Background of the Invention” (FF 54):                                                               
                               In another important use, antibodies can be directly injected into subjects                            
                       suffering from an attack by a substance or organism containing the antigen in question to                      
                       combat this attack.  This process is currently in its experimental stages, but its potential is                
                       clearly seen.  Third, whole body diagnosis and treatment is made possible because                              
                       injected antibodies are directed to specific target disease tissues, and thus can be used                      
                       either to determine the presence of the disease by carrying with them a suitable label, or                     
                       to attack the diseased tissue by carrying a suitable drug.                                                     
                       In a portion (“second portion”) of the application that appears under the heading                              
               “Detailed Description”, the Cabilly applications state that chimeric antibodies having human                           
               constant regions are “less likely to elicit an immune response from a human subject when the                           
               antibodies are injected than would the constant region from a non-human source” (FF 55).                               
                       Glaxo has not shown that the Cabilly applications do not describe therapeutic treatment.                       
               We read this first portion of the Cabilly specification, found under the heading “Background of                        
               the Invention”, as describing direct injection as a way of using antibodies in general in                              
               therapeutic treatment.  Glaxo has not sufficiently explained why one skilled in the art would not                      
               read this first portion of the Cabilly applications as describing a use for the antibodies the                         
               applications describe.  Moreover, the second portion of the Cabilly applications that appears                          
               under the heading  “Detailed Description” describes injecting antibodies into a human subject.                         
               When we consider the two portions of the Cabilly applications together, we determine that Glaxo                        
               has not shown that the Cabilly applications do not reasonably convey to one skilled in the art that                    
               Cabilly was in possession of the therapeutic treatment of humans.                                                      





                                                                -43-                                                                  





Page:  Previous  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007