The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 17 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 January 9, 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES J4N 9-z--202: PAT & TMP ROBIN SCOTT, BOA 1) OFFIC& ANDOF PATENT Junior Party, INTCFFý'4 APPE4L81 (Application 29/088,642), ENCES V. WILLIAM R. DAWS and KAZUNOBU NAKAMURA, Senior Party, (Patent Design D417,254). Patent Interference No. 104,562 Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge . SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 A decision on motion (Paper 14) granted the parties'joint motion to change the inventoship of the subject matter of involved Design Patent D417,254 from WILLIAM R. DAWS and KAZUNOBU NAKAMURA to ROBIN SCOTT, WILLIAM R. DAWS and KAZUNOBU NAKAMURA. Junior party Scott has filed a paper (Paper 15) expressly abandoning its involved Application, 29/088,642. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of an involved application is treated as a request for entry of an adverse judgment. Accordingly , it isPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007