DAWS et al. - Page 1





                                                   The opinion in support of the decision being                                           
                                                entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      
                                                                                                                Paper 17                  
                   Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                      
                           Box Interference Filed:                                                                                        
                           Washington, D.C. 20231 January 9, 2002                                                                         
                           Tel: 703-308-9797                                                                                              
                           Fax: 703-305-0942                                                                                              
                                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           

                                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                                                                   J4N 9-z--202:                          
                                                                                               PAT & TMP                                         
                                                             ROBIN SCOTT, BOA 1) OFFIC&                                                   
                                                                                              ANDOF PATENT                                
                                                               Junior Party, INTCFFý'4 APPE4L81                                           
                                                        (Application 29/088,642), ENCES                                                   

                                                                     V.                                                                   
                                        WILLIAM R. DAWS and KAZUNOBU NAKAMURA,                                                            
                                                               Senior Party,                                                              
                                                        (Patent Design D417,254).                                                         

                                                     Patent Interference No. 104,562                                                      

                   Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge .                                                        

                   SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge                                                                                   
                                            JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662                                                           
                           A decision on motion (Paper 14) granted the parties'joint motion to change the inventoship                     
                   of the subject matter of involved Design Patent D417,254 from WILLIAM R. DAWS and                                      
                   KAZUNOBU NAKAMURA to ROBIN SCOTT, WILLIAM R. DAWS and KAZUNOBU                                                         
                   NAKAMURA. Junior party Scott has filed a paper (Paper 15) expressly abandoning its involved                            
                   Application, 29/088,642. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of an involved                                 
                   application is treated as a request for entry of an adverse judgment. Accordingly , it is                              








Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007