The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 40 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Administrative Patent Judge Box Interference Filed Washington, D.C. 20231 7 January 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES NIALED WEN-FOO CHERN JAN 7 - 2002 Junior Party PAT. & T.M. OFFICE (Patent 5,182,529), BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES V. HITOSHI YAMADA, TAMIHIRO ISHIMURA, and YOSHIO OHTSUKI Senior Party (Application 07/986,571). Patent Interference No. 104,624 Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and LEE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges. MEDLEY, Administrative Patent judae. FINAL DECISION AND JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR 15 1.658(a) A. Introduction This interference was declared on September 11, 2000. The parties agreed to proceed directly to the priority phase of the interference. Chern filed a principal brief alleging a priorPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007