The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 26 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ THOMAS F. DUNLAP, KARL G. CHRISTENSEN and ERIK O. ROE Junior Party (Application 08/861,257)1 v. WILLIAM H. FORT and CARL FRANK Senior Party (Patent No. 5,788,008)2. _______________ Patent Interference No. 104,652 _______________ Before SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT On November 1, 2001, the board received a paper transmitted by facsimile from junior party Dunlap. (Paper No. 25). The word “COPY” is stamped on its cover and the title is “REQUEST FOR 1 1 Filed May 21, 1997. The real party in interest is Warn Industries, Inc. 2 2 Based on application 08/679,298, filed July 12, 1996. The real party in interest is Joseph Pollak Corporation.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007