The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 30
Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed:
Washington, D.C. 20231 14 March 2002
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
DOUGLAS RODENBERG
Junior Party,
(Patent 5,783,528),
v.
RANDALL KRINKER
Senior Party
(Application 09/214,717).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,666
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, LEE and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Senior party Krinker has requested entry of Adverse Judgment. Paper 28. A settlement
agreement has been filed and made of record in the interference file.
Accordingly , it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 5), is
awarded against the senior party, RANDALL KRINKER;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, RANDALL KRINKER, is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 18-23, 28-30 and 33 (corresponding to Count 1) of Application 09/214,717; and
Page: 1 2 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007