The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 69 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 August 23, 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ROBERT G.G. HOLMES, ADRIAN J. BULL, ADRIAN M. SIMPER, JOHN E.A. SHAW, DAVID E. BRENNAN, RICHARD 1. SIMPSON and LYN WESTWOOD, FAXED Junior Party, 4W rz 3 2002 (Application 08/817,255), PAT SITU-OFFICEEALS V. BolkRo bF pýjFNT APP AND I"TERFEIZENCES PAUL YAGER, JAMES P. BRODY, MARK R. HOLL, FRED K. FORSTER and PAUL C. GALAMBOS, Senior Party, (Patent 5,93 2, 100). Patent Interference No. 104,668 Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and GARDNFR-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 Holmes has filed a request for entry of an adversejudgment under 37 CFR § 1.662(a). Paper 68. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count I (Paper 1, p.5), is awarded against the junior party, ROBERT G.G. HOLMES, ADRIAN J. BULL, ADRIAN M.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007