ECKHARDT et al. V. NOVOTNY et al. - Page 3




                                       ORDER                                          
               Upon consideration of the record of the interference, it is            
                    ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 in                
          interference 104,689, the sole count in interference 104,689, is            
          awarded against senior party PAVEL NOVOTNY by JAROSLAVA NOVOTNY,            
          JUAN ANTONIO MONTARAZ CRESPO, and JURAJ IVANYI;                             
                    FURTHER ORDERED that senior party PAVEL NOVOTNY by                
          JAROSLAVA NOVOTNY, JUAN ANTONIO MONTARAZ CRESPO, and JURAJ                  
          IVANYI, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 22-31 of              
          US application 09/343,398, which correspond to Count 1 of the               
          104,689 interference;                                                       
                    FURTHER ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1           
          in interference 104,690, the sole count in interference 104,690,            
          is awarded against senior party PAVEL NOVOTNY by JAROSLAVA                  
          NOVOTNY, JUAN ANTONIO MONTARAZ CRESPO, and JURAJ IVANYI;                    
                    FURTHER ORDERED that senior party PAVEL NOVOTNY by                
          JAROSLAVA NOVOTNY, JUAN ANTONIO MONTARAZ CRESPO, and JURAJ                  
          IVANYI, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 22, 24,               
          25, 28, and 30 of US application 09/343,398, which correspond to            
          Count 1 of the 104,690 interference;                                        










                                        - 3 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007