Interference No. 104,696 Paper 65 Khavari v. Tang Page 3 irritant", while Tang claim 167 requires no comparable limitations. According to Khavari (Paper 24 at 7), its claim I defines, at most, a species of the Tang claim 167. [7] Mammals are vertebrates [ 1002 at fl. [8] Hair is characteristic of mammalian skin, although not all mammalian skin has hair [ 1002 at 2]. [9] Khavari's disclosure states [2001 at 4:17-20): Preferably ...the skin to which the polynucleotide is applied is intact and is not pretreated to remove hair. [10] Khavari submitted portions of Tang's disclosure [2002]: [10.1] The first page provides part of a protocol involving shaving and chemically depilating mice. The protocol also includes the use of adenovirus as a vector. [10.2] The second page describes evidence that "shaving appeared as an essential component for NIVS [non-invasive vaccination onto the skin] presumably due to the mechanical removal of cornified epithelium along the shaving path." The example involved "adenovirus-mediated NIVS". [10.3] The third page provides an example involving pre-shaved mice. Again an adenovirus vector [AdCMV] is used. [111 It is not clear whether any of these examples involve a "immunogen-encoding polynucleotide ...not contained within a viral particle" as required in Khavari claim 1. [121 Tang's involved claims 148 and 149 state: 148. A method of non-invasively inducing a systemic immune response, comprising topically administering, a plasmid DNA and liposome complex vector that encodes a gene of interest and expresses a protein encoded by the gene ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007