MORGAN et al. V. ANDERSON et al. - Page 2




                  Interference No. 104,712                                                                              Paper No. 91                      
                  Anderson v. Morgan                                                                                           Page 2                     
                           FURTHER ORDERED that Anderson is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-14                                               
                  of Anderson's 5,399,346 patent, which correspond to Count 1;                                                                            
                           FURTHER ORDERED that Morgan is not entitled to a patent containing claims 30-34,                                               
                  36, and 43-49 of Morgan's 08/153,275 application, which correspond to Count 1;                                                          
                           FURTHER ORDERED that the preliminary statements be returned unopened; and                                                      
                           FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be given a paper number and be                                                    
                  entered in the administrative records of Anderson's 5,399,346 patent and Morgan's 08/153,275                                            
                  application.                                                                                                                            



                                                           RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                                                             
                                                           Administrative Patent Judge                                                                    
                                                                                                            BOARD OF PATENT                               
                                                                                                               APPEALS AND                                
                                                           RICHARD TORCZON                                    INTERFERENCES                               
                                                           Administrative Patent Judge                                                                    
                                                                                                              INTERFERENCE                                
                                                                                                              TRIAL SECTION                               
                                                           ERIC GRIMES                                                                                    
                                                           Administrative Patent Judge                                                                    










                  Notice:  Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral agreements                       
                  referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of the interference, shall be in writing            
                  and a true copy thereof filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office before termination of the interference as                
                  between said parties to the agreement or understanding.  35 U.S.C. 135(c); 37 C.F.R. § 1.661.                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007