The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 106
Filed by: Interference Trial Section
Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed:
Washington, D.C. 20231 28 June 2002
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
ANNE R. KOPF-SILL and JOHN W. PARCE,
Junior Party,
(Patent 5,842,787),
v.
PAUL YAGER, JAMES P. BRODY, MARK R. HOLL,
FRED K. FORSTER and PAUL C. GALAMBOS,
Senior Party
(Application 09/346,852).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,718
_______________
Before: SCHAFER, LEE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662
Senior party Yager has filed a paper (Paper 101) expressly abandoning involved Application,
09/346,852. Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), the abandonment of an involved application is treated
as a request for entry of an adverse judgment. Because of the express abandonment, it is unecessary
to consider the parties’ preliminary motions. Accordingly, it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007