The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 18 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: May 2, 2002 Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS ANDINTERFERENCES IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE and MICHIO NAKAI M A I LEE) Junior Party, Patent 5,700,470 MAY 2 - 2002 V. PAT. & T.M. OFFICE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS WEI-WEI ZHANG AND INTERFERENCES and JACK ROTH Senior Party Application 08/222,285 Patent Interference No. 104,757 (CAS) Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a) "Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(a), the party Saito hereby abandons the contest as to Count I and claims 1-6 corresponding thereto" (Paper 17). Therefore, it isPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007