The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 18
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed: May 2, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
ANDINTERFERENCES
IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE
and MICHIO NAKAI M A I LEE)
Junior Party,
Patent 5,700,470 MAY 2 - 2002
V. PAT. & T.M. OFFICE
BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
WEI-WEI ZHANG AND INTERFERENCES
and JACK ROTH
Senior Party
Application 08/222,285
Patent Interference No. 104,757 (CAS)
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR � 1.662(a)
"Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. � 1.662(a), the party Saito hereby abandons the contest
as to Count I and claims 1-6 corresponding thereto" (Paper 17). Therefore, it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007