The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 19
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: May 10, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES FAXED
KURT DIETLIKER, MARTIN KUNZ, MAY 10 2002
HITOSHI YAMATO, CHRISTOPH DE LEO PAT & TM. OFFICE
Junior Party, BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
(U.S. Application 09/242,145) AND INTERFERENCES
V.
KATSUMI OOMORI, HIDEO HADA,
FUMITAKE-KANEKO, MITSURU SATO, KAZUFUMI SATO,
TOSHIMASA NAKAYAMA
Senior Party
(U.S. Patents 5,976,760 and 6,245,930).
Patent Interference No. 104,758
Before: GARDNER-LANE, MEDLEY and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGEMENT
(Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a))
A telephone conference call was held on May 9, 2002, at approximately 2:30 p.m.,
involving:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007