The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 19 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 19 April 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES FAXED NAN-XING HU, PAUL F. SMITH APR 1 9 2002 and BENG S. ONG, Junior Party, PAT & TM. OFFICE (Patent 5,944,650), BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS ANDINTERFERENCES V. MANOHAR SAINDANE and DAVID LADD, Senior Party, (Application 09/489,831). Patent Interference 104,779 (McK) Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Jud2es. PER CURIUM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662 A telephone conference call was held on April 17, 2002, at approximately 10:00 a.m., involving: 1. Richard E. Schafer, Administrative Patent Judge. 2. Paul F. Morgan, Esq., and Eugene Palazzo, Esq., counsel for Hu (Xerox). 3. Royal N. Ronning, Jr., Esq., counsel for Saindane (Amersham Health).Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007