and (4) Fred E. McKelvey, Senior Administrative Patent Judge. In this telephone conference call, the parties agreed that on the record of this interference proceeding: (1) Starrett is accorded the benefit for priority of its provisional application, serial no. 60/045,155, filed on April 30, 1997; (2) Vuligonda is accorded the benefit for priority of its application, serial no. 08/764,466, filed December 12, 1996; (3) Starrett stated in its preliminary motion that it would rely for priority solely on the filing date of its provisional application; (4) Starrett conceded that it was not entitled to a patent on its involved claims; and (5) the parties have not entered into a settlement agreement. B. Order Upon consideration of the telephone conference call summarized immediately supra, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 2, the sole count in the interference, is awarded against junior party Starrett. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007