The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 20
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: December 11, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
MAILED
DANIEL L. FLAMM
Junior Party DEC 2002
(U.S. Application 08/748,746), PAT & TM OFFICE
BOARD OF PATENT
V. AND INTERFER,'N"FALS
GEORGY VINOGRADOV AND SHIMAO YONEYAMA
Senior Party,
(U.S. Patent 5,965,034).
Patent Interference No. 104,807
Before: TORCZON, TIERNEY and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judg
FINAL JUDGMENT
This interference was declared between Flamm U.S. Application No. 08/748,746
("Flamm '746") and Vinogradov et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,965,034 ("Vinogradov '034"). At the
time of declaration, the Flamm '746 application listed Daniel L. Flamm as sole inventor whereas
Vinogradov '034 listed Georgy Vinogradov and Shimao Yoneyama as joint inventors. Both the
Flamm application and the Vinogradov patent claim 35 U.S.C. § 120 benefit of U.S. Application
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007