The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 73
Filed by: Trial Section Motions Panel
Box Interference Filed: December 23, 2002
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES FAXED
JEFFREY M. SULLIVAN, PEC 2 3 m2
and DANIEL ANTHONY GATELY
PAT & TU. OFF-ICE
Junior Party, BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
(U.S. Patents 6,015,916 and 6,455,719), ANDINTERFERENCCS
V.
CARSTEN BINGEL,
BERTHOLD SCHIEMENZ, and MARKUS GORES
Senior Party,
(Application 09/508,057).
Patent Interference No. 104,818 (MPT)
Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL JUDGMENT AND RECOMMENDATION
(Pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a) and § 1.659(c))
1. Judgment on Priority
Sullivan was Ordered to Show Cause "why judgement on priority should not be entered
against Sullivan." (Order to Show Cause, Paper No. 62). In response to this Order, Sullivan
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007